NJH Logo National Journal of Homeopathy
 
Seminars & CME's
Sure Shot Cases
Archives
Matrimonials
Journal Subscription
News
Editorial Board
 
 

Buy NJH Online

 

Join NJH Discussion Forums


Subscribe
 
Cover Image
One of NJH Covers
 

 
CASES MATERIA MEDICA GENERAL ARTICLES ABSTRACT MISCELLANEOUS Q & A

From Our Masters Rich Heritage
NATIONAL JOURNAL OF HOMOEOPATHY 1997 Sep / Oct VOL 5 NO 5.
Dr T K Kasiviswanathan
'Guaic / Form rufa / Rhus-tox

CASE 3
Mr S K I, aged 50 years, consulted Dr P Sankaran on 25-4-1962 with the following history. In 1932, he had a severe attack of pneumonia. In 1945, he had bronchitis and sciatica and then in 1955 he suffered from angina pectoris. Since beginning of 1962 he was having pain in the (L) shoulder with restriction of movements. The pain was agg by raising the arm and it was amel while working. The pain wandered from joint to joint and it was worse when rising from a sitting position. He also got pain in interscapular and lumbar regions which was agg in sitting or standing position and was amel by stretching. He was also feeling weak for the last two months. He liked to sleep on the hard floor and wanted extra salt in his food.
He had condylomata and pedunculated warts on the body.

The case was worked with the following symptoms from Boger's Synoptic Key as under:-
Motion agg (p26,392) + wandering (26,434) - Puls, Rhus-tox
+ Joints (39) - Puls, Rhus-tox
+ sitting agg - Puls, Rhus-tox
+ standing amel (27) - Puls, Rhus-tox
+ stretching amel (28) - Puls, Rhus-tox

Dr Sankaran selected Rhus-tox as the patient was amel by cold and prescribed Rhus-tox 1 M, 3 doses, followed by Sac-lac.

3-5-1962- The patient was slightly better. Dr Sankaran thought that to speed up the recovery a deeper acting antisycotic remedy was called for; because of the wandering joints pains, desire for salt and the presence of warts, he selected Thuja and it was given (3 doses of 1 M) followed by Sac-lac.
10-5-62- The patient reported that he was better in general and there was relief in the pains. Thuja 10 M one dose.
23-5-62 Thuja 10 M one dose + Sac-lac.
19-6-62 Thuja 50 M one dose.
5-7-62 The patient complained of sudden pains in the joints in left upper extremity which was amel by pressure and by lying on cold floor. Hence he was prescribed again Rhus-tox 1 M, 3 doses.
12-7-62 The patient was better and Rhus-tox 10 M was given but the patient was worse off. Hence Calc-flour 30 three doses were given (Calc-flour is a deeper acting analogue of Rhus-tox)
There was continued improvement and Calc-flour 200 was given on 28-7-62, 4-8-62 and on 11-8-62 Calc-flour 1 M was prescribed. Thereafter the patient was practically normal and stopped the treatment. After 6 months the patient reported that he was quite well.

Case 4
Mr V G, aged 37 years, consulted Dr P Sankaran on 27 Nov 1960 for the following complaints. He had headache for the last 4 years. The pain started in the shoulder or rather in the nape of neck and extending unto temples around the eye either right or left and to the vertex with soreness. There was stiffness in the neck agg while bending head forward and if he was irritated. (He had become more irritable more recently). The pain was agg by exposure to sun, seeing movies, noise and contradiction. The pain was ameliorated by pressure and bending the neck forward.
The other symptom was easy satiety with fullness in the abdomen after stool. Thirst, stool sleep, sweat etc. were reported to be normal. There was a burning sensation in soles which was agg with shoes on and in the night time. The doctor suspected arthritis and the X-ray revealed fracture."

To Dr Sankaran the case seemed to be Climicifuga and the repertorial work-out also confirmed it.
Back pain, cervical region extending to vertex (KP p901) + head pain reading agg
(p146) Calc-carb, Chel, Cimic, Glon, Sep, Sil
+ Head pain amel bending head forward (p 136) - Cimic
+ head pain amel pressure (p 145)-Cimic
+ Irritability (p 57) - Cimic
+ Back stiffness, cervical region - Cimic

He was therefore given Cimicifuga 1 M on 3-12-60. He reported some improvement. Sac-lac was given. The same remedy in the same potency was repeated as and when needed on 9/12, 16/12, 27/12, and 5/1/61. On 12/1/61 the patient reported he was completely well but pain returned on 27/1/67 and hence he was given Cimic 10 M and later 50 M on 24-2-61. CM potency one dose each was given on 18th March and 15th May 61. With these doses he got good relief and whenever there was recurrence of pain he was given Cimic30 or 1 M. Later he was prescribed 10 M one dose weekly from Nov 61 for few weeks which ameliorated his complaints. In Nov 1962 he reported that he was quite well and continued to remain so thereafter.

Sources
1. A Rheumatic patient- Kent's Minor Writings, edited by Dr Gypser (P 712-3)
2. A case of Arthritis-Dr Sunil Anand - Homeopathic Links, 1/94
3. Osteo - arthritis- Dr P Sankaran - IJHM old issue
4. Osteo - arthritis- Dr P Sankaran - IJHM old issue

Back

Select Cases:
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O |
P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | X | Y | Z |

Select MM:
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O |
P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | X | Y | Z |
 

SEARCH

About Us
Feedback
Advertise
Contact Us
Home
 
Print this page
Send this page